The Fed is trying to tighten financial conditions to cool down inflation, and they do this by raising the Fed funds rate. And the Fed’s models find that the neutral Fed funds rate where monetary policy is neither accommodative nor restrictive is when the Fed funds rate is 2.5%, which is where the Fed funds rate is today. Last week, the Fed argued that with the Fed funds rate now at neutral, they would drop forward guidance and instead be flexible meeting-by-meeting.
The analytical challenge is that the models estimating r-star, or the neutral Fed funds rate, only include one interest rate, namely the Fed funds rate, and don’t include the true costs of capital for firms and costs of borrowing for households such as the yields on IG, HY, and loans, and also the level of the S&P500 for companies, and the costs of borrowing on auto loans and credit cards and mortgages.
Put differently, the Fed funds rate can be at 2.5% and S&P500 at 3000, and HY spreads at 10%, and this would probably not be considered neutral.
Similarly, the Fed funds rate at 2.5%, S&P500 at 5000, and HY spreads of 3% would probably be regarded as easy financial conditions.
The bottom line is that the assumptions going into the academic models estimating the neutral Fed funds rate are simply too far away from the real world to make their estimates of r-star useful. With equities and credit now rallying, the bottom line is that the true r-star is higher, which is a different way of saying that to successfully cool the economy down, the Fed will likely have to raise rates more than the market is currently pricing.
Source: Bloomberg, Apollo Chief Economist
This presentation may not be distributed, transmitted or otherwise communicated to others in whole or in part without the express consent of Apollo Global Management, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “Apollo”).
Apollo makes no representation or warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the accuracy, reasonableness, or completeness of any of the statements made during this presentation, including, but not limited to, statements obtained from third parties. Opinions, estimates and projections constitute the current judgment of the speaker as of the date indicated. They do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of Apollo and are subject to change at any time without notice. Apollo does not have any responsibility to update this presentation to account for such changes. There can be no assurance that any trends discussed during this presentation will continue.
Statements made throughout this presentation are not intended to provide, and should not be relied upon for, accounting, legal or tax advice and do not constitute an investment recommendation or investment advice. Investors should make an independent investigation of the information discussed during this presentation, including consulting their tax, legal, accounting or other advisors about such information. Apollo does not act for you and is not responsible for providing you with the protections afforded to its clients. This presentation does not constitute an offer to sell, or the solicitation of an offer to buy, any security, product or service, including interest in any investment product or fund or account managed or advised by Apollo.
Certain statements made throughout this presentation may be “forward-looking” in nature. Due to various risks and uncertainties, actual events or results may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking information. As such, undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of terminology including, but not limited to, “may”, “will”, “should”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “target”, “project”, “estimate”, “intend”, “continue” or “believe” or the negatives thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology.
