The Daily Spark

Want it delivered daily to your inbox?

  • Impact of Fed Hikes on Lower-Rated CLO Collateral

    Torsten Sløk

    Apollo Chief Economist

    Fed hikes are having a more and more negative impact on companies with higher leverage, lower coverage ratios, and weaker cash flows. Specifically, the latest data for the third quarter shows that downgrades by S&P of CLO collateral have surpassed upgrades by a ratio of 4:1, see the first chart below.

    The bottom line is that Fed policy is working exactly as the textbook would have predicted. Higher rates are biting harder and harder on middle-market corporates with poor credit metrics.

    With total employment in high yield-issuing companies at 11 million and total employment in loan-issuing companies at 8 million, higher rates will ultimately have a negative impact on employment, see the second chart.

    Source: S&P Global Ratings, Apollo Chief Economist
    Total employment in the US high yield index: 11 million; total employment in the leveraged loans index: 8 million
    Source: Bloomberg, ICE BofA H0A0 Index, Morningstar LSTA Index, Apollo Chief Economist. Note: Data includes 842 companies in the HY index with employment data available for 584 companies and median employment assumed for the rest. Similarly, there are 1,073 companies in the leveraged loans index with employment data available for 450 companies and median employment assumed for the rest.

    Download high-res chart(s)

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


  • Households More Worried About Their Retirement

    Torsten Sløk

    Apollo Chief Economist

    The 60/40 portfolio continues to underperform, and households are getting more worried about their retirement, see chart below.

    Households are more worried about a comfortable retirement
    Source: University of Michigan, Haver Analytics, Apollo Chief Economist

    Download hi-res chart(s)

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


  • Share of IG and HY Maturing Within Three Years

    Torsten Sløk

    Apollo Chief Economist

    European credit is more vulnerable to higher rates because the share of IG and HY bonds maturing within three years is higher in Europe than in the US, see charts below.

    For US IG, the share has, for the past decade, been stable between 15% and 20%.

    The bottom line is that Fed hikes and ECB hikes are having a negative impact on credit, but the impact is going to be more significant in Europe, which increases the likelihood of a harder landing in Europe.

    Share of high yield bonds maturing within three years
    Source: ICE BofA, Bloomberg, Apollo Chief Economist
    Share of IG corporate bonds maturing within three years
    Source: ICE BofA, Bloomberg, Apollo Chief Economist

    Download hi-res chart(s)

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


  • Outlook for Private Markets

    Torsten Sløk

    Apollo Chief Economist

    Since 2010, private credit has grown much slower than bank lending and IG markets, see chart below.

    Our monthly outlook for private markets is available here.

    Cover page
    Table of contents
    Since 2010, lending by banks has increased by $5.5 trillion, IG markets have grown $5.5 trillion, HY markets have grown $500 billion, and private credit AUM has increased by $800 billion
    Source: FRB, ICE BofA, Bloomberg, Apollo Chief Economist

    Download hi-res chart(s)

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


  • Outlook for Banks

    Torsten Sløk

    Apollo Chief Economist

    Our updated regional banking sector outlook is available here, and the weekly data shows a continued decline in loan growth in small and large banks, see the first chart.

    The slowdown in loan growth is driven by Fed hikes and tighter lending standards following the SVB collapse.

    With the Fed on hold until the middle of next year, these trends are likely to continue, and loan growth will soon turn negative.

    Weekly Fed data shows small and large bank lending growth slowing after SVB
    Source: Federal Reserve Board, Haver Analytics, Apollo Chief Economist
    Bank stocks since the SVB collapse
    Source: Bloomberg, Apollo Chief Economist. Note: The KBW Bank Index consists of Bank of NY Mellon, Bank of America, Capital One Financial, Citigroup, Citizens Financial Group, Comerica, Fifth Third Bank, First Horizon, Huntington, JP Morgan Chase, Keycorp, M&T Bank, Northern Trust, PNC, People’s United Financial, Regions, State Street, Truist, US Bancorp, Wells Fargo, and Zions.
    Funding costs for banks since SVB and FRB
    Source: ICE BofA, Bloomberg, Apollo Chief Economist. Note: Unweighted average spreads of bonds from ICE 5-10 Year US Banking Index, C6PX Index for bonds issued before January 1, 2023. There are eight banks in the Regional index and 41 banks in the Diversified index. Regional banks include BankUnited, Citizens Financial, Huntington, and Zions. Diversified banks include JP Morgan Chase, Citibank, and Bank of America.
    $1053 billion inflows into money market funds during this Fed hiking cycle
    Source: FRB, ICI, Bloomberg, Apollo Chief Economist
    Banks with total assets between $100 million and $10 billion are more exposed to CRE loans
    Source: FDIC, Apollo Chief Economist

    Banks from $1 billion to $10 billion have lower liquidity ratios
    Source: FDIC, Bloomberg, Apollo Chief Economist

    Download hi-res chart(s)

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


  • The Costs of Capital Are Permanently Higher

    Torsten Sløk

    Apollo Chief Economist

    The Fed has since the beginning of 2023 steadily increased its estimate of the long-run fed funds rate, see chart below. The implication for investors is that the Fed is beginning to see the costs of capital as permanently higher. A permanent increase in the risk-free rate has important implications for firms, households, and asset allocation across equities and fixed income.

    FOMC members continue to increase their estimate of the long-run Fed funds rate
    Source: FRB, Apollo Chief Economist

    Download hi-res chart(s)

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


  • The Age of Free Money Is Over

    Torsten Sløk

    Apollo Chief Economist

    There is downward pressure on buybacks because of worries about a recession, the new tax on buybacks, and higher cost of capital.

    These three forces make free cash flow more valuable for companies, see chart below.

    Higher costs of capital putting downward pressure on buybacks
    Source: Bloomberg, Apollo Chief Economist

    Download hi-res chart(s)

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


  • Negative Equity Risk Premium

    Torsten Sløk

    Apollo Chief Economist

    Calculating the equity risk premium using trailing earnings and forward earnings shows that stocks are at their least-attractive levels in 20 years relative to bonds, see charts below.

    The equity risk premium measures the return in the stock market minus the return of the risk-free rate, and it tells investors something about equity returns relative to fixed-income returns.

    In the equity risk premium formula, equity returns are normally calculated by looking at the S&P500 earnings yield, i.e., the inverse of the P/E ratio. Using forward earnings expectations can be misleading when the consensus expects a 55% chance of a recession, so another variant is to look at the S&P500 earnings yield using trailing earnings.

    Either way, the bottom line is that with 10-year interest rates close to 5%, the stock market today is more unappealing than it has been in 20 years, see again charts below.

    Stocks are unattractive to bonds per the difference between the trailing earnings yield and the10-year Treasury yield.
    Source: Bloomberg, Apollo Chief Economist
    Stocks are unattractive to bonds per the difference between the trailing earnings yield and the10-year Treasury yield.
    Source: Bloomberg, Apollo Chief Economist

    Download hi-res chart(s)

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


  • Incorrect Fed Expectations

    Torsten Sløk

    Apollo Chief Economist

    The market is currently pricing that the FOMC will start cutting rates in June 2024, but the chart below shows that the market is almost always wrong about what the Fed will do beyond the next FOMC meeting.

    Looking at the chart, it is remarkable how mean reverting the error is.

    When rates are low, the market is systematically pricing that the Fed will soon hike.

    When rates are high, the market is systematically pricing that the next move from the Fed is to cut.

    Maybe the Fed will cut rates next summer. Maybe not.

    For now, investors should be planning on rates staying higher for longer.

    Fed fund futures are almost always wrong about what the Fed will do.
    Source: Bloomberg, Apollo Chief Economist

    Download hi-res chart(s)

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


  • Inflation Reaccelerating in Recent Months

    Torsten Sløk

    Apollo Chief Economist

    Key measures of inflation have reaccelerated in recent months, and supercore inflation at 4% is too high compared with the Fed’s 2% inflation target, see charts below.

    The bottom line is that it is too early for the Fed to declare victory over inflation, and the Fed needs to slow down the economy further to get inflation under control.

    The implication for investors is that the Fed will keep rates high until nonfarm payrolls go negative, because that is what is needed to get inflation under control, and this fact is generally underappreciated in markets.

    Inflation is picking back up
    Source: BLS, Haver Analytics, Apollo Chief Economist
    Supercore inflation is rising month to month
    Source: BLS, Haver Analytics, Apollo Chief Economist
    Supercore inflation is too high
    Source: BLS, Haver Analytics, Apollo Chief Economist

    Download hi-res chart(s)

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


This presentation may not be distributed, transmitted or otherwise communicated to others in whole or in part without the express consent of Apollo Global Management, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “Apollo”).

Apollo makes no representation or warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the accuracy, reasonableness, or completeness of any of the statements made during this presentation, including, but not limited to, statements obtained from third parties. Opinions, estimates and projections constitute the current judgment of the speaker as of the date indicated. They do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of Apollo and are subject to change at any time without notice. Apollo does not have any responsibility to update this presentation to account for such changes. There can be no assurance that any trends discussed during this presentation will continue.

Statements made throughout this presentation are not intended to provide, and should not be relied upon for, accounting, legal or tax advice and do not constitute an investment recommendation or investment advice. Investors should make an independent investigation of the information discussed during this presentation, including consulting their tax, legal, accounting or other advisors about such information. Apollo does not act for you and is not responsible for providing you with the protections afforded to its clients. This presentation does not constitute an offer to sell, or the solicitation of an offer to buy, any security, product or service, including interest in any investment product or fund or account managed or advised by Apollo.

Certain statements made throughout this presentation may be “forward-looking” in nature. Due to various risks and uncertainties, actual events or results may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking information. As such, undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of terminology including, but not limited to, “may”, “will”, “should”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “target”, “project”, “estimate”, “intend”, “continue” or “believe” or the negatives thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology.