The Daily Spark

Want it delivered daily to your inbox?

  • Interest coverage ratios for September show that Fed hikes continue to have a more and more negative impact on the economy.

    Specifically, with the Fed funds rate at 5.5%, we are significantly above the Fed’s 2.5% estimate of neutral, and as a result, monetary policy is biting harder and harder, and the incoming data continues to weaken.

    The interest coverage ratio for investment grade bonds continues to fall.
    Source: Bloomberg, Apollo Chief Economist
    The interest coverage ratio for high yield bonds continues to fall.
    Source: Bloomberg, Apollo Chief Economist

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


  • Response Rates Continue to Decline

    Torsten Sløk

    Apollo Chief Economist

    The quality of the incoming economic data continues to deteriorate, see chart below.

    For example, the response rate to the Current Employment Survey, which collects data on nonfarm payrolls, is below 50%, and the response rate to the JOLTS survey, which collects data on job openings, is around 30%.

    The implication for markets is more adjustments, more revisions, and ultimately more volatile data.

    Response rates continue to decline
    Source: BLS, Apollo Chief Economist

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


  • VC Valuations Down 50%

    Torsten Sløk

    Apollo Chief Economist

    As the costs of capital have normalized, venture capital valuations have declined by 50%, see chart below.

    US venture capital valuations are down 50% from the peak
    Source: Bloomberg, Apollo Chief Economist. Note: The Refinitiv Venture Capital Index is designed to measure the value of the US-based venture capital private company universe in which venture capital funds invest.

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


  • 23% Increase in Treasury Auction Sizes in 2024

    Torsten Sløk

    Apollo Chief Economist

    Treasury auction sizes will increase on average 23% in 2024 across the yield curve, see chart below. This forecast comes from the Treasury Borrowing Advisory Committee’s neutral issuance scenario.

    The 37% increase in issuance of 3-year notes and the 28% increase in issuance of 5-year notes will in 2024 stress-test demand for Treasuries in the belly of the curve. In particular, if the Fed next year will start cutting rates and wants to soften financial conditions.

    This dramatic growth in the supply of the risk-free asset is “pulling dollars away” from other fixed-income assets, including investment grade credit, as investors substitute away from spread products toward Treasuries.

    With the ongoing significant increase in the supply of Treasuries, investors in credit markets need to spend some time on signs of demand and supply imbalances in the Treasury market.

    The bottom line is that the world only saves a limited amount of dollars every year, and the significant growth in the size of the Treasury market is at risk in 2024 of crowding out demand for other types of fixed income.

    Treasury auction sizes will in 2024 increase on average 23% across the yield curve
    Source: SIFMA, TBAC, Haver Analytics, Apollo Chief Economist. Note: Estimates from September 2023 to December 2024 from the TBAC neutral issuance scenario.

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


  • Why Is a Soft Landing Unlikely?

    Torsten Sløk

    Apollo Chief Economist

    The Fed is in the process of cooling the economy down. The whole idea with raising interest rates is for us to buy fewer cars, spend less on our credit cards, and to build fewer factories.

    The Fed’s ultimate goal is to get inflation back to their 2% inflation target. But with core PCE inflation currently at 3.9%, we are not there yet.

    The desired slowing of the economy could come this Friday when we get the employment report for September.

    The consensus expects 165,000 jobs in September, which is down from 400,000 jobs a year ago and 600,000 when the Fed started raising rates in March 2022.

    What will happen in credit markets over the coming months once nonfarm payrolls finally move below the level consistent with population growth, namely, 100,000 jobs created each month?

    Once nonfarm payrolls start moving below 100,000, credit spreads will widen because investors will take it as a sign that corporate earnings are about to slow down, see illustration below.

    But with core PCE inflation at 3.9%, the Fed cannot turn dovish because it will look like the Fed no longer cares about inflation, which raises the risk of inflation expectations becoming unanchored. As a result, the Fed will continue to be hawkish even as the unemployment rate starts moving higher.

    Once the recession finally begins, the Fed can turn dovish and start to lower base rates. But the costs of capital will not decline because at that time corporate earnings will be slowing, and therefore, credit spreads will likely be widening further.

    The bottom line is that even if we get weak data and the Fed, after a few soft prints in nonfarm payrolls, starts turning dovish, the costs of capital will move higher. In short, the Fed controls the base rate but doesn’t control credit spreads, and that is the reason why a soft landing is unlikely.

    What will happen in credit markets once the labor market finally starts softening?
    Source: Apollo Chief Economist

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


  • Is China the Source of Higher US Long Rates?

    Torsten Sløk

    Apollo Chief Economist

    Maybe China is behind the rise in US long rates. Growth in China is slowing for cyclical and structural reasons, and Chinese exports to the US are lower. As a result, China has fewer dollars to recycle into Treasuries. In fact, China has been selling $300 billion in Treasuries since 2021, and the pace of Chinese selling has been faster in recent months, see charts below and the presentation available here.

    If slowing growth in China is a source of higher US rates—together with the US sovereign downgrade, Fed QT, Japan YCC exit, and rising US Treasury issuance—then a bad US employment report on Friday may not result in dramatically lower rates.

    The bottom line is that the cost of capital will likely stay permanently higher for reasons that have little to do with the business cycle, and it was the period with essentially zero interest rates from 2008 to 2020 that was unusual.

    China has sold $300 billion in Treasuries since 2021, including $40 billion since April 2023
    Source: Bloomberg, Apollo Chief Economist
    Diverging growth trends in the US and China
    Source: Bloomberg, Apollo Chief Economist
    China: Exports are slowing
    Source: Bloomberg, Apollo Chief Economist
    China real estate index in recession territory
    Source: NBS, Haver, Apollo Chief Economist. Note: A reading above 100 indicates economic growth and a reading below 100 indicates a slowdown in China’s real estate market.

    Home price-to-income ratio five times higher in Shanghai than in New York
    Source: Numbeo, Apollo Chief Economist. Note: Price to Income Ratio is the basic measure for apartment purchase affordability. It is generally calculated as the ratio of median apartment prices to median family disposable income, expressed as years of income.
    China: In 2000 there were 10 workers per retiree. Today there are 5.
    Source: UN, Haver, Apollo Chief Economist
    Outlook for China

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


  • The Price of Orange Juice

    Torsten Sløk

    Apollo Chief Economist

    Bad weather has pushed the price of orange juice to the highest level ever, see chart below.

    The price of OJ is at a record high.
    Source: Bloomberg, Apollo Chief Economist

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


  • US Banking Sector Outlook

    Torsten Sløk

    Apollo Chief Economist

    Our updated banking sector chart book is available here.

    Outlook for US Regional Banks
    Table of contents
    Bank stocks since the SVB collapse
    Source: Bloomberg, Apollo Chief Economist
    Unrealized Gains (Losses) on investment securities for banks, as of 2023Q2
    Source: FDIC, Apollo Chief Economist
    $870 billion in deposits have left banks since the Fed began to raise interest rates
    Source: Federal Reserve Board, Haver Analytics, Apollo Chief Economist. Note: March data as of May 10, 2023. Peak is defined as the month before monthly outflows turn negative.
    $993 billion inflows into money market funds during this Fed hiking cycle
    Source: FRB, ICI, Bloomberg, Apollo Chief Economist
    Weekly Fed data shows small and large bank lending growth slowing rapidly after SVB
    Source: Federal Reserve Board, Haver Analytics, Apollo Chief Economist

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


  • The Outlook for the 60/40 Portfolio

    Torsten Sløk

    Apollo Chief Economist

    There is something weird going on in US government bond markets, and the relentless increase in long-term interest rates is quite ominous for the economy, and perhaps also for financial stability. 

    We are late in the cycle, and Fed hikes are biting harder and harder on consumers and firms. Stock markets see the negative effects of tighter monetary policy, and equities are trading lower. But long-term interest rates should be going down, not up.

    So what is going on?

    With the term premium accounting for the entire move in long rates since July, we know that the source of higher long-term interest rates is not Fed expectations.

    If the move is not driven by changing Fed expectations, what are then the reasons why long rates are moving higher? There are several potential explanations:

    1) First, with declining repo it could be an unwind of the basis trade that is pushing long rates higher, somewhat similar to what happened in March 2020. This has been getting a lot of attention, and maybe conditions for getting repo are tightening.

    2) Another potential explanation is the slowing growth in China, which means that China is recycling fewer dollars into Treasuries because of declining Chinese exports.

    3) Rates may also be moving higher because of the Fed still doing QT. Remember, the entire goal with QT is to put upward pressure on government bond yields.

    4) The US budget deficit remains big at 6% of GDP, which requires more Treasury issuance today and in the future, and investors may be reacting to that.

    5) The US sovereign downgrade has likely had a negative impact.

    6) Japan exiting YCC has put upward pressure on JGB yields, which, despite high hedging costs, makes US yields less attractive.

    7) There is a large stock of T-bills outstanding, and the Treasury intends over the next six months to increase auction sizes across the Treasury curve.

    No matter which explanation is more important, it is clear that the spike in rates is having a very negative impact on consumers and firms, and the risks of a hard landing are intensifying.

    For investors in the 60/40 portfolio, the ongoing volatility in a high rates environment is stomach-churning, see chart below. Over the past two months, the 60/40 portfolio has lost 5%, and with an outlook of high rates and slowing earnings—which is needed to get inflation under control—the outlook for the 60/40 portfolio remains negative.

    60/40 portfolio down 5% in the past two months
    Source: Bloomberg, Apollo Chief Economist. The Bloomberg US BMA6040 Index rebalances monthly to 60% equities and 40% fixed income.

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


  • Comparing Public and Private Markets

    Torsten Sløk

    Apollo Chief Economist

    There is $130 trillion in global fixed income outstanding, see chart below.

    The total market cap of global equity markets is $101 trillion.

    The total value of all assets in the global banking sector is $98 trillion.

    And total global private capital AUM is $13 trillion.

    The first conclusion is that private capital makes up less than 5% of global financing markets.

    Over the past decade, global fixed income markets have increased $42 trillion, the global equity market cap has increased $35 trillion, global assets on banking sector balance sheets have increased by $34 trillion, and the global amount of private capital AUM has increased $8 trillion, see charts below.

    The second conclusion is that private capital has over the past decade grown much slower than global financing markets.

    The bottom line is that the alternatives industry is small, and has over the past decade grown much slower than the rest of the financial system.

    Our latest outlook for private markets is available here.

    Source: SIFMA, BIS, Pitchbook, Apollo Chief Economist. Note: Data as of 2022 and 2023Q2 (BIS data).
    Source: SIFMA, BIS, Pitchbook, Apollo Chief Economist
    Source: SIFMA, Apollo Chief Economist
    Source: SIFMA, Apollo Chief Economist
    Source: BIS, Haver Analytics, Apollo Chief Economist
    Source: Pitchbook, Apollo Chief Economist. Note: Data as of 31st December 2022.

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


This presentation may not be distributed, transmitted or otherwise communicated to others in whole or in part without the express consent of Apollo Global Management, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “Apollo”).

Apollo makes no representation or warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the accuracy, reasonableness, or completeness of any of the statements made during this presentation, including, but not limited to, statements obtained from third parties. Opinions, estimates and projections constitute the current judgment of the speaker as of the date indicated. They do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of Apollo and are subject to change at any time without notice. Apollo does not have any responsibility to update this presentation to account for such changes. There can be no assurance that any trends discussed during this presentation will continue.

Statements made throughout this presentation are not intended to provide, and should not be relied upon for, accounting, legal or tax advice and do not constitute an investment recommendation or investment advice. Investors should make an independent investigation of the information discussed during this presentation, including consulting their tax, legal, accounting or other advisors about such information. Apollo does not act for you and is not responsible for providing you with the protections afforded to its clients. This presentation does not constitute an offer to sell, or the solicitation of an offer to buy, any security, product or service, including interest in any investment product or fund or account managed or advised by Apollo.

Certain statements made throughout this presentation may be “forward-looking” in nature. Due to various risks and uncertainties, actual events or results may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking information. As such, undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of terminology including, but not limited to, “may”, “will”, “should”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “target”, “project”, “estimate”, “intend”, “continue” or “believe” or the negatives thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology.