The Daily Spark

Want it delivered daily to your inbox?

  • Big Difference Between 0% and 5%

    Torsten Sløk

    Apollo Chief Economist

    The divergence between the Fed funds rate and interest rates on checking accounts is the fundamental reason why money is being moved out of bank deposits and into higher-yielding investments, including money market accounts, see charts below. Higher rates as a source of instability for deposits and Treasury holdings are highly unusual compared to previous banking crises, where the source of instability has typically been credit losses putting downward pressure on the illiquid side of banks’ balance sheets.

    Growing divergence between the Fed funds rate and interest rates on checking accounts is increasing the risk of bank deposit outflows
    Source: FRB, RateWatch, Haver Analytics, Apollo Chief Economist
    More than $200bn went into money market funds since SVB went under
    Source: Bloomberg

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


  • Deposit Outflows

    Torsten Sløk

    Apollo Chief Economist

    Today at 4:15 pm, we get data from the Fed showing what happened to deposits and lending in small banks the week after SVB went under. The weekly H8 data can be found here, and it shows that deposits were already declining for both small and large banks in the weeks leading up to SVB’s failure, see chart below. Once the data is out we will update our weekly banking sector chart book and send it out over the weekend.

    Deposits have been declining in large banks since the Fed began to raise rates in March 2022
    Source: Federal Reserve Board, Haver Analytics, Apollo Chief Economist

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


  • Capital Markets Have Been Shut Since SVB

    Torsten Sløk

    Apollo Chief Economist

    Since SVB went under, there has been basically no HY issuance, IG issuance, or IPO activity, see chart below. And completed M&A activity since Friday, March 10 reflects long-time planned M&A rather than new risk-taking. The longer capital markets are closed, and the longer funding spreads for banks remain elevated, the more negative the impact will be on the broader economy.

    US capital markets have been essentially frozen since SVB went under
    Source: Pitchbook LCD, S&P Capital IQ, Bloomberg, Apollo Chief Economist

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


  • Credit Conditions for Consumers

    Torsten Sløk

    Apollo Chief Economist

    The University of Michigan asks consumers about credit conditions, and the chart below shows that even before the SVB situation, credit conditions had tightened to levels last seen in 2008, see chart below.

    Credit conditions are at 2008 levels for consumers
    Source: University of Michigan, Haver Analytics, Apollo Chief Economist

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


  • SVB is likely to have a more negative impact on the economy than Orange County, LTCM, and the UK LDI episode because what happened with SVB will change the behavior of regional banks.

    Most importantly, the costs of capital have increased, and underwriting standards have tightened.

    Our updated outlook for credit markets is available here.

    credit market outlook
    Credit spreads wider, but still not pricing in a recession
    Source: ICE BofA, Bloomberg, Apollo Chief Economist

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


  • More Money Going into Money Market Funds

    Torsten Sløk

    Apollo Chief Economist

    Since the Fed began to raise interest rates a year ago, the amount of money in money market funds has increased by roughly $400bn, and the inflows increased by more than $100bn last week, see chart below.

    Source: Bloomberg

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


  • Outlook for US Regional Banks

    Torsten Sløk

    Apollo Chief Economist

    Regional banks are impacted by higher funding costs, deposit risks, regulatory pressures, and asset declines, including future credit losses from the lagged effects of Fed hikes, and these forces combined are likely to result in tighter credit conditions. Our weekly banking sector chart book is available here, key charts inserted below.

    Lagged effects of Fed hikes combined with tighter credit conditions...
    Source: Apollo Chief Economist. Represents the views and opinions of Apollo’s Chief Economist. Subject to change at any time without notice.
    Weekly data shows that bank deposits are declining for both small and large banks
    Source: Federal Reserve Board, Haver Analytics, Apollo Chief Economist
    FRA-OIS spread remains elevated
    Source: Bloomberg. Note: Ticker used USFOSC1 BGN Currency. As of March 13, 2023.
    FRA-OIS spread at levels seen in March 2020
    Source: Bloomberg. Note: Ticker used USFOSC1 BGN Currency. As of March 13, 2023.
    Fed Discount Window borrowing higher than in 2008
    Source: Federal Reserve Board, Haver Analytics, Apollo Chief Economist
    Share of insured deposits, by bank size
    Source: Federal Reserve Board, Haver Analytics, Apollo Chief Economist
    Divergence recently between small bank and large bank lending growth
    Source: Federal Reserve Board, Haver Analytics, Apollo Chief Economist
    Small banks account for almost 70% of all commercial real estate loans outstanding
    Source: Federal Reserve Board, Haver Analytics, Apollo Chief Economist
    Interest rate on checking accounts versus the Fed funds rate
    Source: FRB, RateWatch, Haver Analytics, Apollo Chief Economist

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


  • Monetary Conditions Are Tightening

    Torsten Sløk

    Apollo Chief Economist

    Quantifying the impact of tighter financial conditions plus tighter lending standards, we estimate that the events this past week correspond to a 1.5% increase in the Fed funds rate. In other words, over the past week, monetary conditions have tightened to a degree where the risks of a sharper slowdown in the economy have increased.

    Source: Bloomberg, Apollo Chief Economist. Note: Two regression models with the Fed funds rate on the left-hand side were run to quantify the effect from tighter financial conditions and tighter lending standards, and the estimated coefficients show 0.5% higher Fed funds rate from tighter financial conditions and 1% higher Fed funds rate from tighter lending standards.

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


  • Upside Risks to Unemployment Emerging

    Torsten Sløk

    Apollo Chief Economist

    The Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act gives 60 to 90 days advance notice in cases of plant closings and mass layoffs. Looking at WARN notices for CA, FL, NY, OH, PA, and TX shows upside risks to jobless claims over the coming weeks, see chart below.

    Source: Department of Labor, Haver Analytics, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Apollo Chief Economist. Note: The Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act helps ensure 60 to 90 days advance notice in cases of qualified plant closings and mass layoffs. WARN notices summed for CA, FL, NY, OH, PA, TX.

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


  • Outlook for Regional Banks

    Torsten Sløk

    Apollo Chief Economist

    Looking ahead, investors will need to monitor what is going on in regional banks with deposits and lending to consumers and lending to corporates. Once a week, when the Fed data for the banking sector is out, we will update and send out a chart book to monitor the situation.

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


This presentation may not be distributed, transmitted or otherwise communicated to others in whole or in part without the express consent of Apollo Global Management, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “Apollo”).

Apollo makes no representation or warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the accuracy, reasonableness, or completeness of any of the statements made during this presentation, including, but not limited to, statements obtained from third parties. Opinions, estimates and projections constitute the current judgment of the speaker as of the date indicated. They do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of Apollo and are subject to change at any time without notice. Apollo does not have any responsibility to update this presentation to account for such changes. There can be no assurance that any trends discussed during this presentation will continue.

Statements made throughout this presentation are not intended to provide, and should not be relied upon for, accounting, legal or tax advice and do not constitute an investment recommendation or investment advice. Investors should make an independent investigation of the information discussed during this presentation, including consulting their tax, legal, accounting or other advisors about such information. Apollo does not act for you and is not responsible for providing you with the protections afforded to its clients. This presentation does not constitute an offer to sell, or the solicitation of an offer to buy, any security, product or service, including interest in any investment product or fund or account managed or advised by Apollo.

Certain statements made throughout this presentation may be “forward-looking” in nature. Due to various risks and uncertainties, actual events or results may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking information. As such, undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of terminology including, but not limited to, “may”, “will”, “should”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “target”, “project”, “estimate”, “intend”, “continue” or “believe” or the negatives thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology.