The Daily Spark

Want it delivered daily to your inbox?

  • Response Rates Declining

    Torsten Sløk

    Apollo Chief Economist

    Survey response rates for employment and inflation have declined significantly during the pandemic, and this is introducing substantial measurement errors and uncertainty, see chart below. One such example is the widening gap between the establishment survey and the household survey in the employment report, with the establishment survey showing 2.6 mn jobs created over the past eight months and the household survey showing no job growth over the same period. Whether the economy created no jobs or 2.6mn jobs over the past eight months is obviously extremely important for the Fed and financial markets.

    Chart showing declines in key economic survey responses
    Source: BLS, Apollo Chief Economist

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


  • The Effects of QT

    Torsten Sløk

    Apollo Chief Economist

    During the pandemic, the Fed expanded its balance sheet by $5trn, and the Fed is now shrinking it by $95bn every month with $60bn in Treasuries and $35bn in mortgages, see the chart below.

    The implications for markets of QT are the opposite of what they were for QE. The idea with QE was to lower rates, boost equities, and narrow credit spreads. With the Fed now in tightening mode, the idea with QT is to raise long rates, lower equities, and widen credit spreads. Such a tightening in financial conditions helps increase the costs of capital and ultimately slow down inflation, see also this Fed paper, which finds that shrinking the Fed balance sheet by $2.5trn is equivalent to increasing the Fed funds rate by half a percentage point.

    There are a lot of opinions in financial markets about the effects of QT, but the Fed’s view is clear: Even if the effects of QT are the opposite of QE, the negative effects on the economy and markets of QT are smaller than the positive effects of QE simply because QE normally comes quicker and bigger than QT. In other words, the fact that QT is drawn out over a much longer period than QE is spreading out the negative effects over a longer period.

    The bottom line is that the Fed, with rate hikes and QT, is tightening financial conditions, and the Fed’s intentions are clear: higher long rates, lower equities, and wider credit spreads. But because these effects are spread out over a longer period than when the Fed is doing QE, the negative effects of QT on markets and the economy are smaller than the positive effects of QE.

    For more, see these Fed papers here, here, here, and this paper by Caballero and Simsek.

    Chart showing that the Fed has started quantitative tightening
    Source: FRB, Haver, Apollo Chief Economist

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


  • Weekend Reading

    Torsten Sløk

    Apollo Chief Economist

    Stiglitz: The Causes of and Responses to Today’s Inflation
    https://rooseveltinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/RI_CausesofandResponsestoTodaysInflation_Report_202212.pdf

    BIS: The global foreign exchange market in a highervolatility environment
    https://www.bis.org/publ/qtrpdf/r_qt2212f.pdf

    How does the Consumer Price Index account for the cost of housing?
    https://www.brookings.edu/blog/up-front/2022/05/18/how-does-the-consumer-price-index-account-for-the-cost-of-housing/

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


  • Slowdown Watch

    Torsten Sløk

    Apollo Chief Economist

    The weekly data for office occupancy rates shows that New York City office use after Thanksgiving reached a post-pandemic high of 50% of capacity, see chart below. Our collection of daily and weekly indicators for the US economy is available here.

    New York City: Office use 50% of capacity
    Source: Bloomberg, Apollo Chief Economist

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


  • The Narrative in Financial Markets is Changing

    Torsten Sløk

    Apollo Chief Economist

    As the Fed starts to approach the peak in the Fed funds rate, the market narrative is changing from “there is a high level of uncertainty about inflation and how high rates will go” to “inflation has peaked and we have a better idea about where rates will peak during this cycle,” see chart below. This ongoing transition in the market narrative has important consequences for rates, credit, and equity markets, including levels of implied and realized vol.

    The Fed is downshifting from 75 to 50 and the market narrative is transitioning
    Source: Apollo Chief Economist

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


  • Capital Markets Starting to Reopen

    Torsten Sløk

    Apollo Chief Economist

    The Fed has clearly communicated that they want to downshift next week from 75bps to 50bps, and as we approach the peak in the Fed funds rate, we should begin to see capital markets reopen again, and in November there was a significant increase in investment grade refinancings and M&A/LBOs, see chart below.

    High grade volume by proceeds
    Source: S&P LCD, Apollo Chief Economist

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


  • Credit Market Outlook

    Torsten Sløk

    Apollo Chief Economist

    Our latest credit market outlook presentation is available here.

    Yields for the leveraged loan index at 9%
    Source: LCD Comps, Apollo Chief Economist
    US IG and HY yield levels now around 5% and 8%, respectively
    Source: ICE BofA, Haver Analytics, Apollo Chief Economist

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


  • Wage inflation has a weight of 25% in the CPI basket via Services ex-energy ex-shelter. The transmission channel is that higher wages in consumer services such as restaurants and hotels increase the price of eating out and staying at hotels.

    The impact of higher wage inflation on the remaining 75% of the CPI index is more complex, see chart below.

    With wages having a limited weight in the CPI basket, it is entirely possible to have higher wage inflation for a period while consumer price inflation is coming down as supply chains get better, rent inflation declines, car price inflation declines etc. In other words, the 25% of the CPI basket that is directly impacted by wages may be rising while at the same time, inflation in the remaining 75% of the basket is declining.

    The bottom line is that with inflation currently at 7.7% and declining rent inflation, declining car price inflation, declining transportation inflation, declining import price inflation, and elevated inventory levels, we may not need a dramatic amount of demand destruction and a significant increase in the unemployment rate for inflation to come down to the Fed’s 2% inflation target. 

    In short, with inflation declining and the labor market remaining solid, the probability of a soft landing is rising.

    Higher wages mainly impacting CPI through services ex energy ex shelter
    Source: BLS, Haver Analytics, Apollo Chief Economist. Note: Weights as of October 2022. Goods also includes traditional commodities

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


  • So Far it Looks Like a Soft Landing

    Torsten Sløk

    Apollo Chief Economist

    Inflation is coming down without a major increase in the unemployment rate, see charts below. That is the definition of a soft landing.

    The unemployment rate normally rises 3%-points during recessions
    Source: BLS, Apollo Chief Economist
    Goods inflation is coming down
    Source: ISM, BLS, Haver Analytics, Apollo Chief Economist
    Service sector inflation is coming down
    Source: ISM, BLS, Haver Analytics, Apollo Chief Economist

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


  • Labor Market Still Overheating

    Torsten Sløk

    Apollo Chief Economist

    The November employment report shows that wage inflation is increasing in the service sector and declining in the goods sector, and most of the jobs created in November were in Leisure and hospitality, see chart below and our chart book available here.

    Hiring strong in the service sector in November
    Source: BLS, Haver, Apollo Chief Economist

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


This presentation may not be distributed, transmitted or otherwise communicated to others in whole or in part without the express consent of Apollo Global Management, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “Apollo”).

Apollo makes no representation or warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the accuracy, reasonableness, or completeness of any of the statements made during this presentation, including, but not limited to, statements obtained from third parties. Opinions, estimates and projections constitute the current judgment of the speaker as of the date indicated. They do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of Apollo and are subject to change at any time without notice. Apollo does not have any responsibility to update this presentation to account for such changes. There can be no assurance that any trends discussed during this presentation will continue.

Statements made throughout this presentation are not intended to provide, and should not be relied upon for, accounting, legal or tax advice and do not constitute an investment recommendation or investment advice. Investors should make an independent investigation of the information discussed during this presentation, including consulting their tax, legal, accounting or other advisors about such information. Apollo does not act for you and is not responsible for providing you with the protections afforded to its clients. This presentation does not constitute an offer to sell, or the solicitation of an offer to buy, any security, product or service, including interest in any investment product or fund or account managed or advised by Apollo.

Certain statements made throughout this presentation may be “forward-looking” in nature. Due to various risks and uncertainties, actual events or results may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking information. As such, undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of terminology including, but not limited to, “may”, “will”, “should”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “target”, “project”, “estimate”, “intend”, “continue” or “believe” or the negatives thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology.