The Daily Spark

Want it delivered daily to your inbox?

  • 153mn People Have a Job in the US

    Torsten Sløk

    Apollo Chief Economist

    The 22 million jobs lost during the pandemic have now been recovered, see chart below. Total US employment at 153 million jobs is now back at the level seen before the pandemic in February 2020.

    Total employment at February 2020 levels
    Source: BLS, Apollo Chief Economist

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


  • Weekend Reading

    Torsten Sløk

    Apollo Chief Economist

    IMF: Natural Gas in Europe: The Potential Impact of Disruptions to Supply

    https://www.imf.org/-/media/Files/Publications/WP/2022/English/wpiea2022145-print-pdf.ashx

    IMF: The Economic Impacts on Germany of a Potential Russian Gas Shutoff

    https://www.imf.org/-/media/Files/Publications/WP/2022/English/wpiea2022144-print-pdf.ashx

    IMF: Market Size and Supply Disruptions: Sharing the Pain of a Potential Russian Gas Shut-off to the European Union

    https://www.imf.org/-/media/Files/Publications/WP/2022/English/wpiea2022143-print-pdf.ashx

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


  • Slowdown Watch

    Torsten Sløk

    Apollo Chief Economist

    The employment report for July shows that the US economy is still not showing any signs of slowing down. With financial conditions easing, the Fed will have to continue to raise rates aggressively to cool down the economy, see chart below. Our set of daily and weekly indicators for the US economy is available here.

    Easing financial conditions are a problem for the Fed
    Source: Bloomberg, Apollo Chief Economist

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


  • With the spread between IG and HY narrowing over the past six weeks, the market seems to believe that the probability of a recession is declining.

    This is inconsistent with the sharp decline in long rates over the same period, suggesting that the Treasury market is getting more worried about a coming slowdown in GDP growth and earnings.

    Maybe the reason is that equity and credit markets focus on the past earnings season and the next earnings season, but Treasury markets have a longer horizon. Equity and credit markets are saying that in the near term, everything is fine, but Treasury markets are saying that a recession next year is likely. But both cannot be right at the same time: Either we will have a recession, and credit spreads should be wider. Or we will not have a recession, and rates should be trading higher.

    Our latest credit market outlook chart book is available here.

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


  • The market cap of the German stock market as a share of global stock markets is near record lows, driven by equity market underperformance and the rising dollar, see chart below. For comparison, Germany’s GDP is currently at 3% of global GDP.

    Germany stock market cap as a share of global stock market cap
    Source: Bloomberg, Apollo Chief Economist

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


  • HY Bonds > 10%

    Torsten Sløk

    Apollo Chief Economist

    There are around 2000 bonds in the HY index and roughly 16% currently trade at a yield higher than 10%, see chart below.

    Chart showing that 16% of high yield bonds have yields greater than 10%
    Source: Bloomberg, Apollo Chief Economist. Note: HY bond universe is H0A0 Index.

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


  • Corporate Bond Market Distress

    Torsten Sløk

    Apollo Chief Economist

    The New York Fed measure of corporate bond market distress is starting to flash red for IG, see chart below. Specifically, the New York Fed corporate bond market distress index is calculated using FISD data on issuance volumes and primary market pricing as well as issuer characteristics.

    For the secondary market, the index uses trading data available through TRACE and includes measures that reflect both the central tendencies, and other aspects of the distributions, of volume, liquidity, nontraded bonds, spreads, and default-adjusted spreads. Finally, the index also uses quoted prices from ICE BoA to capture the differential secondary market conditions for traded and non-traded bonds. For more see also here.

    NY Fed measures of corporate bond market distress
    Source: FRB of New York, Apollo Chief Economist Note: The CMDI index offers a single measure to quantify joint dislocations in the primary and secondary corporate bond markets. Ranging from 0 to 1, a higher level of CMDI corresponds with historically extreme levels of dislocation. CMDI links bond market functioning to future economic activity.

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


  • The Fed’s Models for R-Star

    Torsten Sløk

    Apollo Chief Economist

    The Fed is trying to tighten financial conditions to cool down inflation, and they do this by raising the Fed funds rate. And the Fed’s models find that the neutral Fed funds rate where monetary policy is neither accommodative nor restrictive is when the Fed funds rate is 2.5%, which is where the Fed funds rate is today. Last week, the Fed argued that with the Fed funds rate now at neutral, they would drop forward guidance and instead be flexible meeting-by-meeting.

    The analytical challenge is that the models estimating r-star, or the neutral Fed funds rate, only include one interest rate, namely the Fed funds rate, and don’t include the true costs of capital for firms and costs of borrowing for households such as the yields on IG, HY, and loans, and also the level of the S&P500 for companies, and the costs of borrowing on auto loans and credit cards and mortgages.

    Put differently, the Fed funds rate can be at 2.5% and S&P500 at 3000, and HY spreads at 10%, and this would probably not be considered neutral.

    Similarly, the Fed funds rate at 2.5%, S&P500 at 5000, and HY spreads of 3% would probably be regarded as easy financial conditions.

    The bottom line is that the assumptions going into the academic models estimating the neutral Fed funds rate are simply too far away from the real world to make their estimates of r-star useful. With equities and credit now rallying, the bottom line is that the true r-star is higher, which is a different way of saying that to successfully cool the economy down, the Fed will likely have to raise rates more than the market is currently pricing.

    Chart showing that financial conditions may be easing.
    Source: Bloomberg, Apollo Chief Economist

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


  • Weekend Reading

    Torsten Sløk

    Apollo Chief Economist

    Predictably Bad Investments: Evidence from Venture Capitalists 

    https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4135861

    Central Bank Communication with the General Public 

    https://gceps.princeton.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/wp291_Blinder-et-al_Central-Bank-Communication.pdf

    Directed Search with Phantom Vacancies 

    https://m.box.com/shared_item/https%3A%2F%2Fgeorgetown.app.box.com%2Fs%2Fvl8ns2kqfwn0mi8y2rl8hzksqugu2bon 

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


  • Slowdown Watch

    Torsten Sløk

    Apollo Chief Economist

    Consensus continues to downgrade growth expectations, and Treasury markets are starting to price a recession coming.  

    This narrative in rates is in sharp contrast to the story being told in equity and credit markets, where the consensus has only revised down earnings expectations very modestly, see chart below.  

    The bottom line is that rates investors and Fed watchers are getting increasingly worried about a coming recession, but equity investors are much more bullish and see little reason to downgrade earnings expectations meaningfully. 

    Our chart book with daily and weekly indicators for the US economy is available here

    See important disclaimers at the bottom of the page.


This presentation may not be distributed, transmitted or otherwise communicated to others in whole or in part without the express consent of Apollo Global Management, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “Apollo”).

Apollo makes no representation or warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the accuracy, reasonableness, or completeness of any of the statements made during this presentation, including, but not limited to, statements obtained from third parties. Opinions, estimates and projections constitute the current judgment of the speaker as of the date indicated. They do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of Apollo and are subject to change at any time without notice. Apollo does not have any responsibility to update this presentation to account for such changes. There can be no assurance that any trends discussed during this presentation will continue.

Statements made throughout this presentation are not intended to provide, and should not be relied upon for, accounting, legal or tax advice and do not constitute an investment recommendation or investment advice. Investors should make an independent investigation of the information discussed during this presentation, including consulting their tax, legal, accounting or other advisors about such information. Apollo does not act for you and is not responsible for providing you with the protections afforded to its clients. This presentation does not constitute an offer to sell, or the solicitation of an offer to buy, any security, product or service, including interest in any investment product or fund or account managed or advised by Apollo.

Certain statements made throughout this presentation may be “forward-looking” in nature. Due to various risks and uncertainties, actual events or results may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking information. As such, undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of terminology including, but not limited to, “may”, “will”, “should”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “target”, “project”, “estimate”, “intend”, “continue” or “believe” or the negatives thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology.